\n on 4th January 2024
\n\n\n\"I had paid over \u00a3700 for the first bill, which had to be amended due to errors, and the second one at over \u00a3450 was also incorrect. This second bill is being disputed. Despite the plumbers having good temperaments and seemingly trying their best, they do not do the job properly. Then you get charged for their coming back again to fix their mistakes! After 34 emails and then both our recorded delivery letters about the disputed bill, the co-owner has now reduced the bill a little. I am still very unhappy with this invoice and the fact that I have spent at least 10 hours going back and forth with them and getting legal advice. This has made me ill and that is the reason why I have agreed to the reduced bill, which is only less \u00a3129 + vat from the \u00a3455.\"
\n\n\n Trader reply:\n \"We are disappointed that you have left this poor review. As discussed in our email conversations, we feel we did nothing wrong. You got charged by us for fitting your WC out of hours, which you requested us to do because the builder you instructed to do the work was not able to. You then said that there were problems on the original first fix which, as we proved, was totally fine with no issues. In order to get paid, we also reduced the cost substantially meaning we are at a loss. The truth is that we actually went above and beyond to assist you as you were desperate for your WC to be fitted that evening. Kind Regards Hall & Randall\"\n
\n\n\n